The Kaiser Papers A Public Service Web SiteIn Copyright Since September 11, 2000
This web site is in no manner affiliated with any Kaiser entity and the for profit Permanente
Permission is granted to mirror this web site -
Please acknowledge where the material was obtained.

Link for Translation of the Kaiser Papers
ABOUT US  |  CONTACT
CONTACT FOR LYME DISEASE INFORMATION  | MCRC  | RSS feedRSS Feed
                                                                                                          
Custom Search
       
lyme.kaiserpapers.info


beautiful classic folder iconNEW:  

Reliable tick distribution and tick disease studies are sorely lacking outside of well recognized endemic areas such as the Northeast,
the
Midwest, and California. For the most part, such studies are either nonexistent, decades old, or poorly executed in other parts of
the country where Lyme disease is not acknowledged to be endemic. Tick infection rates and tick density can vary greatly from one area
to another, even in close proximity. The most reliable indication of the potential risk of Lyme disease and coinfections is the presence of
Ixodes ticks in an area.


Lyme Disease Information for Kaiser Permanente Patients


beautiful classic folder iconCalifornia and the Pacific Northwest Tick Borne Disease Information
beautiful classic folder iconCalifornia and the Pacific Northwest Tick Borne Disease Articles
beautiful classic folder iconLetters
beautiful classic folder iconRecommended Medical Articles
beautiful classic folder iconRecommended Sites
beautiful classic folder iconSites Not Recommended
beautiful classic folder iconRecommended Books
Connecticut Attorney General's Office Press Release
Attorney General's Investigation Reveals Flawed Lyme Disease Guideline Process, IDSA
Agrees To Reassess Guidelines, Install Independent Arbiter
May 1, 2008

In fact, United Healthcare, Health Net, Blue Cross of California,
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan
and other insurers have used the
guidelines as justification to deny reimbursement for long-term
antibiotic treatment."


Connecticut Attorney General Investigation and Settlement Highlights

beautiful classic folder iconPossible Applicability of Antitrust Standard Setting Law to the Development
of Clinical Practice Guidelines By Richard Wolfram 1 
Antitrust HealthCare Chronicle - 
PDF File Download Link

A letter to United States President Barack Obama regarding
Evidence based medicine & Medical Corruption
beautiful classic folder iconIn pdf form - download
beautiful classic folder iconIn html form

LYME DISEASE IN CALIFORNIA
beautiful classic folder iconIntegrated Pest Management for Home Gardeners and Landscape Professionals
AUTHOR: R. S. Lane, Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley 

                      







Introduction



Lyme disease is a serious bacterial infection caused by Borrelia burgdorferi, a corkscrew-shaped
bacterium of the spirochete group. 
Other spirochetes cause diseases such as syphilis, rat-bite fever
and relapsing fever.
The primary means of infection is by tick bite although the disease has also been
shown to be transmitted by other insects. The nymphal Ixodes tick, the primary culprit in transmission, 
is so small
(about the size of a poppyseed) the victim will rarely notice it and will not feel it bite. People
should  not be lulled into thinking themselves safe because they did not notice a tick.  
Maternal-fetal
transmission of the Lyme disease
spirochete has been demonstrated by a number of credible clinical
studies by Lyme disease researchers.
Sexual transmission of Lyme disease is suspected by leading
clinical practitioners.


Because of the unreliability of most tests and laboratories, Lyme disease can be difficult to diagnose
for those with no expertise. Inexperienced doctors tend to rely on highly restrictive CDC testing criteria
that very few can meet  –  perhaps only 5% to 10% of those with proven Lyme disease that was never
treated. 
They naively believe that if a person does not meet the strict and exclusionary CDC serodiagnostic
crtiteria developed for surveillance purposes, that person does not have Lyme disease. Kaiser doctors have
used this ploy as a means to support a non-diagnosis.  
The CDC has repeatedly stated that Lyme
disease is a clinical diagnosis and that surveillance case standards should not be used for diagnostic
purposes.


Most experienced doctors diagnose Lyme disease according to the cluster of symptoms it can present. 
These symptoms are stated in the articles within this section. The most common symptom associated
with Lyme disease is fatigue. The “erythema migrans” rash is the only symptom specific to the disease
but only occurs in 50% or fewer of those infected. It normally occurs within 30 days of infection and
then fades. Late-stage Lyme disease victims often do not notice and do not recall a rash.
 


Kaiser’s Lack of Tick Borne Disease Expertise and Misdiagnoses
 

Kaiser does not seem to have any doctors experienced in tick borne diseases. The guidelines they
follow promote the view that Lyme disease as  
"hard to catch and easy to cure"despite the fact that
the disease is epidemic in their market areas.
 Late-stage and chronic cases can involve long-term
treatment and substantial expense. They also have not shown any demonstrated expertise, judging from
our patient inputs, in diagnosing coinfections of Lyme disease and other infections which can be as
devastating as Lyme disease.
Complications of Lyme disease and tick-borne coinfections are often
disabling and sometimes can be fatal.


Kaiser's usual reaction is to misdiagnose the patient with a syndrome of unknown case and unknown
cure or to suggest a patient has psychiatric disorders. Or the member may simply be abandoned.
Some of the more common misdiagnoses are chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, 
multiple sclerosis,
lupus and early Alzheimer's disease. If a well meaning Kaiser doctor tries to help a patient with advanced
Lyme disease, that doctor is normally forced to defer to Kaiser’s infectious disease doctors who will
likely deny a diagnosis of Lyme disease.

 


Kaiser’s Economic Rationale for Denials and Methods of Denial
 

An upper-level Kaiser employee explained to me why Kaiser will not help Lyme disease victims. This
person, and the spouse of this person, both have chronic Lyme disease. They have to go to a non-Kaiser
doctor for treatment and pay out-of-pocket. This person explained that Kaiser views Lyme disease in
the same context as AIDS only that Lyme disease is far more common and the risk exposure far greater.
AIDS has been and is a large cash drain for Kaiser and they don’t want to repeat the experience. So
their solution is not to diagnose in the first place or to severely limit Lyme diagnoses. This explanation is
consistent with Kaiser’s behavior – it’s about money.

 
Kaiser has thus far managed to escape culpability by claiming to follow restrictive guidelines published
by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). 
The Connecticut Attorney General has launched
an investigation into the monopolistic guidelines policy of IDSA and the "Lyme experts" who authored the
IDSA guidelines.
There are two standards of care for Lyme disease. Kaiser will not give the member the
choice of following the guidelines issued by the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society (ILADS)
because the open-ended treatment could prove too costly.

 
Kaiser has gone one step farther than the IDSA guidelines in order to avoid diagnoses. West Coast patients
have had their blood samples sent to the East Coast for analysis, a practice that has been condemned by IDSA
because of the high risk of sample degradation.  According to laboratory records, in some cases samples were
not analyzed for as long as two weeks after the blood draw, likely rendering the sample worthless. In other cases
samples have been sent to the laboratory of Allen Steere (IDSA).Another factor is that the cheap and inaccurate
Elisa “screening” test that Kaiser uses is based on an East Coast strain of the Lyme spirochete. Comparison
with a reference strain that differs from the strains found on the West Coast will be more likely to produce a
"negative" result.  Kaiser has been known to dismiss test results from the highest rated laboratories in the country
for tick borne infections, no matter how specific and how diagnostic the results may be.
 
One method used by ethically challenged HMO’s and health insurers to discourage extended treatment is to file
anonymous complaints to state medical boards against doctors who “overdiagnose and overtreat” Lyme disease.
In fact, Kaiser instigated one of the earliest cases of Lyme physician harassment in the United States by filing a
complaint against an Oregon doctor who was diagnosing and treating Lyme patients, one of whom was a Kaiser
member. Kaiser was “tipped off” to this physician when the patient attempted to fill a prescription for long-term
antibiotics through a Kaiser pharmacy. Kaiser paid for an East Coast "Lyme expert" to testify before the Oregon
Board of Medical Examiners on whom Kaiser appears to have an undue influence, not only in this case but other
cases as well not involving Lyme disease. This “Lyme expert” is now part of the investigation by the Connecticut
Attorney General.


The physician was told to stop treating Lyme patients or to give up his license. Since no physician has the
resources to contest Kaiser’s legal and financial assets, he chose the former and was forced to give up his
Lyme patients. This early case of Lyme physician harassment has had a very negative effect on the ability of
Pacific Northwest residents to get help for Lyme disease since this threat has discouraged regional doctors
to become specialists in tick borne diseases. The Pacific Northwest is also home to two ex-presidents of the
Infectious Diseases Society of America, David Gilbert of the Oregon Health & Science University and Walter
Stamm of the University of Washington, both of whom seem to do their utmost to insure that regional doctors

comply with IDSA restrictions on treating Lyme disease.

Some states, including California, have adopted legislation to protect doctors treating Lyme disease.


Conclusions

A Kaiser member who suspects they have Lyme disease should seek help from a tick-borne disease specialist.
Prompt and sufficient treatment is essential to prevent the disabling complications and probable incurability of a late-stage
infection and a potential lifetime of misery. Undertreatment is a potentially dangerous option. Kaiser Lyme
disease victims in Oregon and Washington normally go to California or the East Coast for competent treatment.
Most tick-borne disease specialists on the West Coast are quite familiar with Kaiser members. East Coast Kaiser
members have a number of excellent tick borne disease specialists available to them.

As a former member of Kaiser for 27 years, I had to change health plans because three infectious disease
specialists at Kaiser Permanente Northwest refused to diagnose me for Lyme disease despite specific
serodiagnostic criteria and symptoms consistent with and diagnostic for Lyme disease. Two of these doctors
never even saw me. At the time, I was in very poor health because of Lyme disease. It took four years of treatment
by a tick borne disease specialist to regain most of my former health.

The loss of 10 potentially productive years – 6 years undiagnosed and 4 years in treatment - can never be
compensated. It was the callousness, ignorance and dishonesty of these doctors and the subsequent knowledge
that Lyme disease denials are standard operating procedure for Kaiser that prompted me to create this Lyme
disease information page for Kaiser members. The refusal to diagnose Lyme disease by Kaiser doctors,
particularly late-stage disease, seems to be quite common.

I hope the information on this page is helpful to those for whom it was intended and that those who read it are
spared the negative and harmful experiences of myself and others regarding Kaiser and Lyme disease.


Miguel Perez-Lizano



For Starters
 

An excellent informational booklet by the Lyme Disease Association of Southeastern PA.
This is very well written for the newcomer to Lyme disease and other tick borne diseases.
http://www.lymepa.org/html/the_basics_-_description.html

"Update on Lyme Disease" by Ginger Savely RN, FNP-C is a comprehensive overview written in a way
the layman can understand the basics.
http://clinicianreviews.com/index.asp?show=lesson&page=courses/105213/lesson.htm&lsn_id=105213




Lyme Disease Information Specific To Kaiser
 

Advice For Kaiser Lyme Disease Victims

How to deal with Lyme and other tick borne infections if you have Kaiser health insurance.
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/lymevictimadvice.html  

A letter to Barbara Johnson, Chief, Molecular Biology Section
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases
Re: HMO abuse of Lyme disease surveillance case definition
Note; The CDC replied that they were not responsible for how HMO’s misused the Lyme
disease surveillance criteria. Barbara Johnson is one of the CDC employees who has a
patent interest in testing for Lyme disease, including the C6 Elisa test the CDC is now
recommending.
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/barbiejo.html
 
"A Critique of Kaiser Lyme Disease Information"Lyme disease:
Discusses some of the Lyme disease information issued by Kaiser which is simply wrong
or misleading.
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/misbymile.html

The Manipulation of HMO Medical Testing
By Charles Phillips, MD FACP 
Fresno, California, April 22, 2003 for the United States Congress.
(Includes a section on Lyme disease)
http://kaiserpapers.org/co/conten.html  

Oregon Health Care Town Hall
Re: Lyme disease (Lyme borreliosis) – lack of access to care
Describes Kaiser as being a major hindrance to the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease in the
Pacific Northwest.
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/abtmiguel.html

Excerpts from Public Law 107-116 Signed by President Bush 1/10/02
“The Committee is distressed in hearing of the widespread misuse of the current Lyme disease
surveillance case definition. While the CDC does state that 'this surveillance case definition was
developed for national reporting of Lyme disease: it is NOT appropriate for clinical diagnosis,' the
definition is reportedly misused as a standard of care.” 
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/presbush.html




Kaiser Lyme Disease Propaganda;

 
Scott Smith, Infectious Diseases, Kaiser Redwood City
"The Professor of Parasites"
“Local cases of Lyme disease are quite unusual -- I see maybe one case per year. I would say
that local residents are at very low risk for contracting Lyme disease. There's a lot more risk in
Humboldt and other northern counties in California. Only about 1 percent of local ticks carry Lyme
disease.” (Note; Factual information from Santa Cruz Public Health Department; “A two-year study
by biologists at San Jose State University found infection rates ranging from 5 to 9 percent among
western black-legged ticks (Ixodes pacificus) and American dog ticks (Dermancentor variabilis)
in Santa Cruz County.”)
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/g/a/2003/10/27/urbananimal.DTL


Kaiser Permanente responds:

"Of course we treat Lyme disease at Kaiser Permanente -- but it is infrequent in California," said
David J. Witt, MD, Chief of Infectious Diseases for Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Kaiser
Permanente's medical group of 4400 physicians serve more than 3.1 million members in 17 hospitals
and 152 medical office buildings in Northern California.

"We follow clinical guidelines for diagnosing and treating Lyme Disease that were published jointly by
The Infectious Diseases Society of America and American Rheumatologic Association. Our world-class
clinical laboratories diagnose complex diseases - including Lyme disease. If there is any question, we
send specimens to the laboratory run by Allen Steere, MD of Massachusetts General Hospital," he said.

(Note: The Lyme disease panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America is under an antitrust
investigation filed by the Connecticut Attorney General. Steere, part of the antitrust investigation, has
publicly bragged that his laboratory could not find evidence of Lyme disease in samples when other
laboratories had positive results (for the same sample).
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/archive/2003/11/17/urbananimal.DTL


Kaiser’s Lyme Disease Executive Summary which was removed from the Internet by Kaiser. Note that
these guidelines discourage testing, give a high (and false) accuracy of the Lyme ELISA screening test,
restrict diagnostic criteria by focusing on joint inflammation and Bell’s palsy, and encourage a diagnosis
of fibromyalgia.
http://www.harp.org/eng/kaiserslymesummary.htm


“In Sonoma County, only about 1 percent of adult ticks and 5 percent of nymphs are infected with the
Lyme disease bacteria, (Gary) Green (Kaiser Santa Rosa, Infectious Diseases) said.”
http://www.msmosquito.com/PD080507.html

Note; In the same article…“But the tick infection rate can vary widely in areas of Northern California.
Anne Kjemtrup, an epidemiologist with the state Department of Health Services, said that in some spots
of Trinity, Humboldt and Mendocino counties, up to 40 percent of nymphal ticks have the Lyme bacterium.”
http://www.sonoma-county.org/health/ph/diseasecontrol/pdf/lyme_ca.pdf
 
Sonoma County continues to have this on their health page despite numerous requests to have it
removed. This is the only non-government reference cited on the Sonoma County Lyme page. This
presentation by Gary Green of Kaiser Santa Rosa suggests the use of CDC surveillance criteria as
diagnostic criteria, relies on sources approved by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA),
now under a Civil Antitrust Investigation by the Connecticut Attorney General, promotes the use of test
kits and laboratories that are modeled around East Coast strains of Lyme disease (and less likely to
give a positive result for West Coast Lyme disease), ignores laboratories on the West Coast and East
Coast that have demonstrated expertise and highest accuracy in diagnosing Lyme disease, ignores
many medical and scientific references that do not support Dr. Green’s (and Kaiser’s) position, and
ignores alternative guidelines by the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society (ILADS).

Guidelines for Lyme Disease Vaccine Use in California for Health Care Providers.  This vaccine is no
longer being manufactured but is very important because Kaiser declared this disease an epidemic
and backed this vaccine before it was found to harm patients..
California and the Pacific Northwest Tick Borne Disease Information


California Lyme Disease Advisory Committee Information - Disease Information and Surveillance
http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/dcdc/disb/ldac.htm

An Update on the Epidemiology of Lyme Disease in California (dated information)
http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/dcdc/disb/pdf/dhs_lyme_medbd_news_10_2001.pdf

Part 2
http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/dcdc/disb/pdf/Epi%20Lyme%20Part%20II.pdf

Lyme Disease in California prepared by Steve Diers, Ranger/Naturalist
An excellent presentation of Lyme disease in California and in general.
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/pdfs/Lyme Disease in California handout-Diers.pdf

Tick borne diseases in Santa Cruz County, California written by Kevin Holden currently with Center
for Comparative Medicine Schools of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine University of California,
Davis ,John T. Boothby, Sulekha Anand (of San Jose State University, San Jose, CA
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/pdfs/Ehrlichia-Santa%20Cruz.pdf

Ventura County, California Lyme Disease Hot Spot Map
http://www.ventura.org/envhealth/programs/vector_control/images/vectmap3.jpg

County of Ventura, Environmental Health, Vector Control Program Lyme Disease
http://www.ventura.org/rma/envhealth/programs/vector_control/lyme.htm

Tick testing results from various California sites compiled by the California Department of Health Services.
The test results may not be a reliable indicator of tick infection rates but the prevalence of ticks in each
location should be noted.
http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/dcdc/disb/pdf/Detection%20of%20the%20Lyme%20Disease%20Agent%20i

Lyme disease in California.
http://www.lymedisease.org/

Lyme disease in Oregon.
http://www.oregonlyme.org/news.htm

Lyme disease in Washington State
http://www.walyme.org/

Shows distribution of Lyme disease vectors (ticks) Ixodes pacificus and Ixodes scapularis by county.
(Note; there are other ticks and insects that are known to transmit Lyme disease.)
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/lyme/tickmap.htm




California and the Pacific Northwest Lyme Disease Articles


Lizard May Act As Lyme Disease Panacea.
(Note; This article by UC-Berkeley discusses a study showing infection rates of ticks in Tilden
Regional Park within the San Francisco Metropolitan Area. In one area 1.3 percent of adult ticks
carried the Lyme disease bacterium, compared to 5.7 percent of nymphal ticks, the reduction
thought to be the bacteriocidal effect on Lyme bacterium of the ticks feeding on Western Fence
lizards. There are two major flaws with the extrapolation of this information. One is that the distribution
of the Western Fence lizard tends to be spotty and diminishes to scarce or nonexistent as one works
north of San Francisco to British Columbia. Ticks also feed on rodents and birds. Second is that, as
far as is known, the Western Fence lizard does nothing to eliminate other tick borne diseases usually
associated with Lyme disease. Also, in other areas, lizards have been demonstrated to carry the Lyme
bacterium.
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/berkeleyan/1998/0429/lizard.html

Bitten by the Controversy Bug by Andy Dworkin of The Oregonian
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/andy.html
 
Memorable quotes from David Gilbert who is considered the regional Lyme expert in Oregon…
“What is increasingly common is patients who think they have Lyme disease, not actual cases,”
said Dr. David Gilbert, an infectious disease expert at Portland-based Providence Health Systems
and past president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.


"I have seen, in maybe 35 years of doing this, at the most two or maybe three cases," he said.
(Comment; this most certainly must qualify him as an expert – one diagnosis every 10 to 15 years.)


Gilbert said that "throughout the history of medicine" some people have developed a set of nagging
symptoms -- often including pain, fatigue and depression -- without an obvious cause. Some of these
patients search for an explanation on their own, which creates a series of pop diagnoses that parade
like fashion trends through medical offices. (Comment; a sorry excuse for physician incompetence
and ignorance.)


”What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You.”
Article:
http://lagrandeobserver.com/news/story.cfm?story_no=10919
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Robynns_Lyme_List/message/3293

Letters in response to article:

http://www.lagrandeobserver.com/news/story.cfm?story_no=10952
“…the Oregon Veterinary Medical Association last year reported over 100 cases of Lyme disease
in the Portland metro area alone. This figure is likely also vastly under reported…”. ”Compare this
to the pathetically low and grossly misleading figure of 3 human cases reported for all of Oregon
last year.”This will lead to some links that direct the Lyme Disease interested person to valid medical
diagnosis and treatment.
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/lymelinks.html

Liz MacLeod of the Amador Ledger Dispatch
Spring season means increased danger of outdoor ticks, Lyme disease
http://www.ledger-dispatch.com/news/newsview.asp?c=210554

Threat Of Disciplinary Action Creates Tense Atmosphere For Lyme Docs
http://tinyurl.com/35aqx2
and mirrored for historical purposes at:  http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/persecute.html

Confronting Lyme Disease Patient Stories - Miguel and Bo. Battle Ground man fights Lyme disease
By Alice Perry Linker, staff reporter with The Reflector
http://www.confrontinglyme.com/miguel.html

Some Kaiser Victim Lyme Patient Stories
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/lymepatientstories.html





Letters


These letters were submitted to the NY Times in response to an article critical of medical laboratories
specializing in tick-borne infections. The letters state how Kaiser has used flawed Lyme testing to deny
Lyme diagnoses.
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/nytimesart.html

Susan J. Landers – AMA reporter that covers public health, science and related federal policy issues.
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/susanlanders.html

A letter to Richard E. Bryant, M.D.
This letter to Dr. Bryant of Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) summarized some problems
with Kaiser and Lyme disease in the Pacific NW.  It was written whenOHSU published the ILADS
Lyme disease guidelines on their web site. The reference was deleted after a short period of time.  
Kaiser and OHSU have a close relationship. Dr. Bryant never replied to this letter.
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/bryanthelp.html

Selected Letters to the Editor regarding Lyme Disease and related infections.
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/leditor.html

The Kaiser/CDC Morgellons Collaboration
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/kaiser-cdc-morgellons-collaboration.html




Recommended Medical Articles


When To Suspect Lyme Disease by John D. Bleiweiss, M.D
An excellent monograph that has helped many.
http://cassia.org/essay.htm

Late and Chronic Lyme Disease:  Symptom Overlap with Chronic  Fatigue Syndrome & Fibromyalgia
By Sam Donta, M.D.

Dr. Donta is an acknowledged Lyme disease expert who has done studies for the Department of
Defense. Dr. Donta refused to be on the IDSA Lyme disease panel because he disagreed with their
recommendations.
http://www.immunesupport.com/library/showarticle.cfm/ID/3579
 
Lyme Disease -point/counterpoint Raphael B Stricker†, Andrew Lautin and Joseph J Burrascano
A professional and well-documented discussion of the problems inherent in Lyme disease diagnosis
and treatment.
http://www.lymemed.nl/discussie/point&counterpoint.pdf

Evidence Based Guidelines for the Treatment of Lyme Disease (ILADS)
http://www.guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?doc_id=4836&nbr=3481&string=lyme

Diagnostic Hints and Treatment Guidelines for Lyme and Other Tick Borne Illnesses by Dr. Burrascano
http://www.ilads.org/burrascano_1102.html

Dr. Daniel Cameron’s Testimony Before the Massachusetts Legislative Committee on Public Health
http://lymeproject.com/Dr_Cameron/News/2Our_news/0Testimony.htm
 
Lyme Disease: the Sensible Pursuit of Answers by Dr. Kenneth Liegner
http://www.lymeinfo.net/sensiblepursuit.html

A synopsis by experts on the current status of Lyme disease in the US and the world.
http://www.timesargus.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070805/NEWS01/708050411

Lyme disease talking points - Based on comments by Dr. Dan Kinderlehrer on the Today Show
http://lyme.kaiserpapers.org/drdan.html

Finding a Doctor that knows how to  treat Lyme Disease
http://cassia.org/llmd.htm

ILADS' Position Paper on the CDC's Statement Regarding Lyme Diagnosis "The Center for Disease
Control's (CDC) position on diagnosing Lyme disease (LD) is an oversimplification  of a complicated
clinical condition.  The CDC's two tiered approach using an ELISA and confirming positives by both
IgM and IgG Western blots--potentially misses more than 40% of the patients. One year after the tick
bite, this percentage may be greater than 50%. "  "Lyme disease is a problematic diagnosis. The
position adopted  by the CDC makes it more complicated."
http://www.ilads.org/position.htm

Conflicts of Interest in Lyme Disease:
http://www.lymediseaseassociation.org/Conflicts.doc

The National Guideline Clearing House  at:

Kaiser seems to run part of the CDC have been after Igenex Inc., of  Palo Alto for years.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2001/12/10/MN195999.DTL




Sites Not Recommended


Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Lyme Guidelines. These guidelines are the basis for
the denial of Lyme disease diagnosis and treatment by Kaiser Permanente. A cabal of 14 authors
and a somewhat larger number of cohorts with significant conflicts of interest seem to control much
of the published information on Lyme disease. Unfortunately, these guidelines are blindly followed by
most doctors who have little or no knowledge about Lyme disease and rely on normally sound and
dependable information from the prestigious IDSA. The IDSA guidelines are also promoted by CDC
Lyme scientists, many of whom have profit interests in Lyme disease.
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CID/journal/issues/v31nS1/000342/000342.web.pdf

American Lyme Disease Foundation. The ALDF is essentially an arm of those relative few who have
controlled Lyme disease information for decades. This includes some of the authors of the IDSA Lyme
disease guidelines. The ALDF also has ties to the CDC and vice-versa. The ALDF was formed by
James Connolly of Castle & Connolly, an HMO advocate. The ALDF and its members have profit interests
in Lyme disease.
http://www.aldf.com/

Quackwatch’s Lyme disease information was prepared by Dr. Edward McSweegan, formerly the Lyme
disease program manager for the National Institutes of Health. For various reasons, Dr. McSweegan 
was removed as the NIH Lyme disease program manager. One of the more bizarre series of incidents
was stalking and harassing a founder of the Lyme Disease Foundation; Karen Vanderhoof-Forschner.
Quackwatch has been successfully sued by patient advocates. They appear to be sponsored by
HMO’s and Big Pharma.
American College of Physicians. The ACP is another tool used by IDSA to propagate their views on
Lyme disease. The same applies to Lyme disease information issued by the American Academy of
Neurology and the American College of Rheumatology. In the case of the latter two institutions, influential
members include authors of the IDSA Lyme disease guidelines.
http://www.acponline.org/lyme/index.html

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  CDC Lyme information tends to be incomplete and not
up-to-date. The CDC is heavily influenced by the authors of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
Lyme guidelines and information and recommendations are perhaps biased by the for-profit interests of
Lyme scientists within the CDC. These comments also apply to Lyme disease information from the
National Institutes of Health (NIH).  CDC Lyme information has been diluted to the extent that it is of little
benefit to the physician and patient.
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/lyme/index.htm

Wikipedia changes its Lyme information over time.  Depending on whether or not the latest
editorial contributor is pro-patient or pro-HMO, the level of knowledge of the contributor and
whether or not the contributor has a self-profit agenda, the content will vary.
The Wikipedia moderator has allowed the content to be almost entirely influenced by IDSA input.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyme disease






Recommended Sites


International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society
http://www.ilads.org/

Lyme Disease Foundation
http://www.lyme.org/

Lyme Disease Association
http://www.lymediseaseassociation.org/

Canadian Lyme Disease Foundation
http://www.canlyme.com/

Lyme Info is an excellent resource for information. The site is well-organized and very comprehensive.
http://www.lymeinfo.net/lymefiles.html

Melissa Kaplan’s Lyme Disease Page; “An Exercise In Nailing Jello To The Wall”.
http://www.anapsid.org/lyme/

IGeneX Laboratories has prepared an excellent summary of testing for Lyme and other tick borne diseases.
http://www.igenex.com/


California - Pennsylvania - Florida - New York - Maryland -and Igenex's own
Certificate of Compliance with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (Nationwide in USA)

 

Lyme Disease Network. A source of archived Lyme disease information and a discussion group.
http://www.lymenet.org/





Recommended Books

Everything You Need to Know About Lyme Disease and Other Tick-Borne Disorders
by Karen Vanderhoof-Forschner
http://tinyurl.com/2ja9cq

Confronting Lyme Disease: What Patient Stories Teach Us
by Karen P. Yerges and Rita L. Stanley
http://tinyurl.com/2pn4ny

Coping with Lyme Disease:  A Practical Guide to Dealing with Diagnosis and Treatment
by Denise Lang and Kenneth Liegner
http://tinyurl.com/2uhneo

Healing Lyme: Natural Healing And Prevention of Lyme Borreliosis And Its Coinfections
by Stephen Harrod Buhner
This book by Stephen Buhner provides some alternative remedies that may be helpful to Kaiser
patients who cannot get immediate help.
http://tinyurl.com/3b9q8l

Cure Unknown: Inside the Lyme Epidemic
by


Under Our Skin
A dramatic tale of microbes, medicine and money, this eye-opening new film investigates
the untold story of Lyme disease, an emerging epidemic larger than AIDS. Each year
thousands go undiagnosed or misdiagnosed, told that their symptoms are “all in their
head.” 

 








Lyme Disease Map from the CDC
lyme.kaiserpapers.org

KaiserPapers.org 
In Copyright since September 11, 2000